NDT Technology

NDT Technology

Comparison of radiography testing and ultraviolet inspection in identifying hidden designs and defects of exquisite paintings

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran;
3 University Institute for the Restoration of the Patrimony, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
Abstract
Art paintings are valuable cultural assets in any country that they are always threatened by dangers such as rupture, scratches, and loss of pigments. Natural disasters, irresponsible handling, exposure to light and temperature changes are all dangers factors. Various non-destructive methods such as radiography testing (RT) and ultraviolet (UV) inspection can be used to identifying detect the location of defects without any damage the paintings. The radiography testing recognized hidden patterns and deep defects and the general structure of the painting due to the penetration of X-rays to the lower surfaces. In the ultraviolet inspection, information about scratches and surface defects is obtained, depending on the type and material of paint used. Images of both methods provide excellent information to restoration experts, but problems such as blurring images of the RT and UV inspection darkening of some colors under ultraviolet light make it difficult to identify the defect regions. It is appropriate to use image processing techniques as an auxiliary tool to increase the contrast of the image. In this research, the Gabor filter has been used to increase the quality of the RT and UV images and reduce the blur of images; The Gabor filter use an automatic threshold level based on the deviation and mean pixel information of the images. Images reconstructed by the Gabor filter are efficient in identifying hidden designs and the location of defects.
Keywords

Subjects


 
[1]     تسلیمی، ن. (1393). سیر هنر در تاریخ (1). چاپ پنجم،  شرکت چاپ و نشر کتاب‌های درسی ایران، ص 13-6 .
[2]      صادقی، س. (۱۳۹۶). آسیب ‌شناسی بناهای تاریخی و مکانیزم‌های تاثیرگذار بر حفاظت و نگه‌داری آثار هنری و تاریخی. کنفرانس پژوهش‌های معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی و تاریخی ایران، شیراز، دبیرخانه دائمی کنفرانس،https://www.civilica.com/Paper-MEMARICONF01-MEMARICONF01_140.html
[3]     Rutledge, S.K., Banks, B.A., Forkapa, M., Stueber, T., Sechkar, E., & Malinowski, K. (2000). Atomic oxygen treatment as a method of recovering smoke-damaged paintings. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 39, 1, 65-74.
[4]     Movafeghi, A. (2018). Neutron radiography for Evaluation of Designs and Defects of Cultural Vase of Samiran at Tehran Research Reactor. Journal of Radiation and Nuclear Technology, 4, 4, 22-30.
[5]     Movafeghi A., Kargarnovin M.H., Soltanian-Zadeh H., et al. (2005). Flaw Detection Improvement of Digitized Radiographs by Morphological Transformations. Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 47, 10, 625-630.
[6]     بنده خدا، ف. (1383). کاربرد تابش فرابنفش به عنوان یکی از روش‌های سنجش غیرتخریبی در مرمت. فصلنامه‌ی تخصصی انجمن علمی دانشکده مرمت، دانش مرمت و میراث فرهنگی، سال اول، شماره 1.
[7]     Baldia, C.M., Jakes, K.A. (2007). Photographic methods to detect colourants in archaeological textiles. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 4, 519-525.
[8]     Da Silva, R.R., Siqueira, M.H.S., De Souza, M.P.V., Rebello, J. M.A., Caloba, L.P. (2005). Estimated accuracy of classification of defects detected in welded joints by radiographic tests. NDT and E International, 38, 5, 335–343.
[9]     Daubechies, I., Defrise, M., and De Mol, C. (2004). An  iterative  thresholding algorithm  for  linear  inverse  problems with  a  sparsity  constraint.  Comm. Pure Appl.  Math., 57, 13, 1413–1457.
[10]  Movafeghi, A., Yahaghi, E., Mohammadzadeh, N., Rokrok. B. (2017). Defect Detection and Contrast Improvement of Radiographic Images using Nonlinear Diffusion Filter Method. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 38, 1, 1-11.
[11]  Serrano, A., de Diego, I.M., Conde, C., Cabello, E. (2011). Analysis of variance of Gabor filter banks parameters for optimal face recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters, 32, 15, 1998-2008.
[12]  Bendada, A., Sfarra, S., Ibarra−Castandeo, C., Akhloufi, M., Caumes, J.–P., Pradere, C., Batsale, J.–C., and Maldague, X. (2015). Subsurface imaging for panel paintings inspection: A comparative study of the ultraviolet, the visible, the infrared and the terahertz spectra. Opto−Electronics Review, 23, 1, 88–99. DOI: 10.1515/oere−2015−0013.
 
[13]  Ferrari, R.J., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L., Frère, A.F. (2001). Analysis of Asymmetry in Mammograms via Directional Filtering With Gabor Wavelets. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 20, 9, 953-964.
[14]  Oh J., Choi, S-I., Kim Ch., Cho J., Choi Ch-h. (2013). Selective generation of Gabor features for fast face recognition on mobile devices. Pattern Recognition Letters, 34, 13, 1540-1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.06.009.
Kruizinga, P., Petkov, N., and Grigorescu, S.E. (1999). Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and processing, Venice, Italy, pp. 142-147.

  • Receive Date 01 March 2021
  • Revise Date 04 May 2021
  • Accept Date 07 May 2021